抗抑郁药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性的网状 Meta分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(GZ2020008)


Efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants for the treatment of patients with panic disorder: a network Meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价抗抑郁药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性。方法 电子检索 Medline、 Embase、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网等中英文数据库,纳入抗抑郁药物治疗 惊恐障碍的头对头随机对照试验,依据 Cochrane 5.1.0 版质量评价标准评价纳入文献的质量并进行偏 倚评价,采用 Stata 14.2 软件进行网状 Meta 分析。结果 共 25 个研究进入网状 Meta 分析,涉及 10 种药 物,分别为米氮平、帕罗西汀、氯丙咪嗪、西酞普兰、氟西汀、文拉法辛、艾司西酞普兰、舍曲林、瑞波西 汀、安非他酮。分析结果显示,有效性较好的药物为艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、文拉法辛、帕罗西汀,但药 物两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05);减分效果最佳的药物为氟西汀、艾司西酞普兰、米氮平、安 非他酮,与氯丙咪嗪比较,氟西汀[MD=4.27(1.12,7.43)]、艾司西酞普兰[MD=3.84(1.49,6.19)]、米氮 平[MD=3.42(0.83,6.01)]、帕罗西汀[MD=2.81(0.82,4.80)]、文拉法辛[MD=2.06(0.11,4.02)]在减分效 果方面具有明显优势,可以显著降低 HAMA 评分,其他两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05);耐受 性较好的药物是帕罗西汀,其次是文拉法辛、艾司西酞普兰,但药物两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论 作为治疗惊恐障碍的一线治疗药物,帕罗西汀、文拉法辛、艾司西酞普兰兼具疗效和安全 性,为可供选择的有效药物。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants for the treatment of panic disorder. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, CBM, CNKI in both English and Chinese databases, for the head-to-head randomized controlled trial of antidepressant treatment for panic disorder. Quality assessment and bias evaluation were conducted with the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.1.0 software. The network Meta-analysis were conducted with the Stata 14.2 software. Results A total of 25 trials met the inclusion criteria, involving 10 medications: mirtazapine, paroxetine, clomipramine, citalopram, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, escitalopram, sertraline, reboxetine, amfebutamone. The result of analysis showed that the drugs with good effectiveness were escitalopram, fluoxetine, venlafaxine and paroxetine, but there were no statistical significance in pairwise comparison of drugs (P> 0.05). The more prominent antidepressants for the effect of score reduction were fluoxetine, mirtazapine, escitalopram, amfebutamone. Compared with clomipramine, fluoxetine [MD=4.27 (1.12,7.43)], escitalopram [MD=3.84 (1.49,6.19)], mirtazapine [MD=3.42 (0.83,6.01)], paroxetine [MD=2.81 (0.82,4.80)] and venlafaxine [MD=2.06 (0.11,4.02)] had obvious advantages in the effect of score reduction, which could reduce the score of Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) significantly. There were no statistical significance in other pairwise comparisons of these drugs (P> 0.05). The drug with good tolerance was paroxetine, followed by venlafaxine and escitalopram, but there was no significant difference in pairwise comparison of these drugs (P> 0.05). Conclusions As the first-line drugs for the treatment of panic disorder, paroxetine, venlafaxine and escitalopram are effective drugs with both efficacy and safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李媛媛,张云淑,王策,严保平,芦云平,王琦.抗抑郁药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性的网状 Meta分析[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2022,22(3):
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2022.03.010.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-28