双相情感障碍患者抑郁和缓解状态脑功能稳定性的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81901355);国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAI17B05);北京市科技计划项目(D121100005012002);首都医科大学附属北京安定医院院级课题(YJ201901)


Comparison of brain functional stability in patients with bipolar disorder in depressive and euthymic mood states
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析处于双相情感障碍(BD)缓解期的患者(EP)和 BD 抑郁期的患者(DP)脑功能 稳定性的特点。方法 选取 2009 年 2 月至 2016 年 6 月于首都医科大学附属北京安定医院就诊的 56 例 BD 患者为研究组,并根据患者所处的情绪状态分为 EP 组(n=30)和 DP 组(n=26)。招募与研究组患者匹 配的 71 名健康对照者作为健康对照组。采用 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)比较 EP 组、DP 组、健 康对照组之间的抑郁程度。采集所有受试者的静息态功能性磁共振成像数据,采用 DPABI 软件对数据 进行预处理和功能稳定性指标的计算并比较 3 组功能稳定性差异,变换不同窗宽、步长和窗的类型进 行重复验证。采用 Pearson 相关分析患者右侧小脑后叶的功能稳定性与 HAMD-17 总分之间的相关性。 结果 EP 组、DP 组、健康对照组受试者 HAMD-17 总分比较[2.00(0,4.00)分比 14.00(10.75,19.50)分 比 0(0,1.00)分],差异有统计学意义(P< 0.01)。不同窗宽 / 步长 / 窗类型的 3 组受试者右侧小脑后叶 功能稳定性比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P< 0.05);EP 组患者右侧小脑后叶的功能稳定性低于 DP 组 和健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05);DP 组和健康对照组功能稳定性比较,差异无统计学意义 (P> 0.05)。研究组、EP 组和 DP 组右侧小脑后叶的功能稳定性与 HAMD-17 总分无相关性(P> 0.05)。 结论 EP、DP 患者表现出不同的脑功能活动模式,仅 EP 患者表现出右侧小脑后叶的功能稳定性降低。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the difference of brain function stability among patients with bipolar disorder (BD) in remission (EP), patients with BD depression (DP) and healthy controls. Methods A total of 56 patients with BD treated in Beijing Anding Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from February 2009 to June 2016 were selected as the study group, and were divided into EP group (n=30) and DP group (n=26) according to their emotional state. Another 71 healthy controls matched with patients in the study group were recruited as the healthy control group. The degree of depression among EP group, DP group and healthy control group were compared by Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17). Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of all subjects were collected. DPABI software was used to preprocess the data and calculate the functional stability index, to compare the differences of the three groups of functional stability. Repeated verification was carried out using different window width, step size and window type. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the functional stability of the right posterior cerebellar lobe and the total score of HAMD-17. Results The total score of HAMD-17 in the EP group, the DP group, and the healthy control group was [2.00 (0,4.00) points vs 14.00 (10.75,19.50) points vs 0 (0,1.00) points], and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.01). The functional stability of the right posterior cerebellar lobe of the three groups of subjects with different window width / step size / window type was compared, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The functional stability of the right posterior cerebellar lobe in EP group was significantly lower than that in DP group and healthy control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the difference of functional stability between DP group and healthy control group (P > 0.05). There was no correlation between the functional stability of the right posterior cerebellar lobe and the total score of HAMD-17 in the study group, EP group and DP group (P> 0.05). Conclusions EP and DP patients show different brain function activity patterns, only EP patients show decreased functional stability of the right posterior cerebellar lobe.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张志芳,薄奇静,李峰,赵蕾,王赟,刘瑞,陈熊鹰,陈真竹,李田,王怡梦,周媛,王传跃.双相情感障碍患者抑郁和缓解状态脑功能稳定性的比较[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2022,22(9):
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2022.09.004.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-21