双相障碍Ⅰ型抑郁发作和重度抑郁障碍患者的认知功能与甲状腺功能及临床特征的关系
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Relationship between cognitive function, thyroid function, and clinical features in patients with bipolar disorder Ⅰ depressive episodes and major depressive disorder
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨双相障碍Ⅰ型抑郁发作、重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的认知功能特点及其与甲 状腺功能和临床特征的关系。方法 选取 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 8 月于武汉市精神卫生中心门诊和住院 部就诊的 45 例双相障碍Ⅰ型抑郁发作患者为双相障碍抑郁发作组,45 例 MDD 患者为 MDD 组;同期在 医院和社会上招募 54 名健康人为对照组。比较 3 组受试者的甲状腺功能指标水平,比较两组患者的汉 密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)得分,采用 MATRICS 共识认知成套测试(MCCB) 比较 3 组受试者的认知功能。通过 Pearson 相关分析两组患者 MCCB 得分与 HAMD、HAMA 得分和促甲 状腺激素(TSH)的相关性,采用多重线性回归分析两组患者认知功能的影响因素。结果 双相障碍抑 郁发作组及 MDD 组患者的 HAMD 得分、HAMA 得分高于对照组[21.0(19.0,27.0)比 22.0(19.0,25.0)比 0(0,0)分、15.0(8.0,18.0)比 15.0(9.0,16.0)比 0(0,0)分],TSH 低于对照组[(2.38±1.85)比(3.29±2.37) 比(3.35±0.81)μIU/ml],差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。双相障碍抑郁发作组和 MDD 组的信息处理 速度、工作记忆、词语学习与记忆、视觉学习与记忆、推理和问题解决能力、社会认知得分均低于对照组 [(29.40±13.85)比(37.87±10.99)比(50.24±8.29)分、(31.80±9.24)比(30.49±8.42)比(46.72±9.56)分、 (31.24±8.61)比(32.89±9.04)比(44.13±7.78)分、(24.00±8.47)比(25.96±6.64)比(42.96±6.91)分、 (35.16±11.35)比(40.02±9.84)比(51.50±7.09)分、(43.64±11.20)比(46.53±10.54)比(52.30±9.85)分], 差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。双相障碍抑郁发作组的信息处理速度、推理和问题解决能力得分低于 MDD 组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.01)。双相障碍抑郁发作组患者的 HAMD 得分与信息处理速度、工作 记忆、词语学习与记忆、推理和问题解决能力呈负相关(r=-0.456~-0.315,P< 0.05),HAMA 得分与词语 学习与记忆呈正相关(r=0.441,P< 0.05);MDD 组患者的 HAMD 得分与信息处理速度、视觉学习与记忆 呈负相关(r=-0.568、-0.336;P< 0.05)。双相障碍抑郁发作组和 MDD 组患者认知功能与 TSH 水平不存 在相关性(P>0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,HAMD得分为双相障碍抑郁发作患者信息处理速度、 工作记忆、推理和问题解决能力、词语学习与记忆的影响因素(P< 0.05),HAMA 得分为双相障碍抑郁发 作患者词语学习与记忆的影响因素(P< 0.05);HAMD 得分为 MDD 患者信息处理速度、视觉学习与记忆 的影响因素(P< 0.05)。结论 双相障碍Ⅰ型抑郁发作和 MDD 患者存在明显的认知功能损伤,前者在 处理速度及问题解决能力上损伤更重,且 TSH 水平较低;抑郁症状、焦虑症状及饮酒可能是认知功能的 影响因素。提示在临床诊疗中需要对认知功能进行早期评估及干预,并且定期进行甲状腺功能的监测 和情感量表的评估,辅助诊疗并促进认知功能恢复。

    Abstract:

    To explore the cognitive function of patients with bipolar disorder Ⅰ depressive episodes and major depressive disorder (MDD), as well as its relationship with thyroid function and clinical features. Methods From June 2021 to August 2022, 45 patients with bipolar disorder Ⅰ depressive episodes who visited the outpatient and inpatient departments of Wuhan Mental Health Centre were selected as the bipolar disorder depressive episode group, and 45 patients with MDD were selected as the MDD group. During the same period, 54 healthy individuals were recruited as the control group in hospitals and society. This study compared the thyroid function indicators among three groups of subjects, the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores between two groups of patients, and the cognitive function of the three groups of subjects using the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Pearson correlation was used to examine the correlation among MCCB scores and HAMD scores,HAMA scores and thyroid stimulating hormone(TSH) in two groups of patients, and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of cognitive function in both groups of patients. Results In the bipolar disorder depressive episode group and MDD group, the HAMD and HAMA scores of patients were higher than those in the control group [21.0 (19.0, 27.0) vs 22.0 (19.0, 25.0) vs 0 (0,0), 15.0 (8.0, 18.0) vs 15.0 (9.0, 16.0) vs 0 (0,0)], and the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was lower than that in the control group [(2.38±1.85) vs (3.29±2.37) vs (3.35±0.81) μ IU/ml], and the differences were statistically significant (P< 0.05). The scores of speed of processing, working memory, verbal learning, visual Learning, reasoning and problem-solving, and social cognition of the bipolar disorder depressive episode group and MDD group were lower than those of the control group [(29.40±13.85) vs (37.87±10.99) vs (50.24±8.29), (31.80±9.24) vs (30.49±8.42) vs (46.72±9.56), (31.24±8.61) vs (32.89±9.04) vs (44.13±7.78), (24.00±8.47) vs (25.96±6.64) vs (42.96±6.91), (35.16±11.35) vs (40.02±9.84) vs (51.50±7.09), (43.64±11.20) vs (46.53±10.54) vs (52.33±9.85)], and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The speed of processing, reasoning and problem-solving scores of the bipolar disorder depressive episode group were lower than those of the MDD group, with statistically significant differences (P< 0.01). In bipolar disorder depressive episode group, the HAMD score was negatively correlated with scores of the speed of processing, working memory, verbal learning, reasoning and problem-solving (r=-0.456 to -0.315, P< 0.05), the HAMA fscore was positively correlated with the score of verbal learning (r=0.441, P< 0.05), and the differences were statistically significant. In the MDD group, the HAMD score was negatively correlated with speed of processing and visual Learning, and the differences were statistically significant (r=-0.568, -0.336; P< 0.05). There was no correlation between cognitive function and TSH levels in patients in the bipolar disorder depressive episode and MDD groups (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression showed that the HAMD score was a factor affecting the speed of processing, working memory, reasoning and problem-solving, and verbal learning of patients with bipolar disorder depressive episodes with a statistical difference (P < 0.05), while the HAMA score was a factor influencing verbal learning in patients with bipolar disorder depressive episodes. The HAMD score was a factor affecting the speed of processing and visual learning of MDD patients, while a history of alcohol consumption was a factor influencing the reasoning and problem-solving with a statistical difference (P< 0.05). Conclusions Patients with bipolar disorder Ⅰ depressive episodes and MDD have significant cognitive impairment, with the former having more severe impairments in processing speed and problem-solving skill, and lower TSH levels. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and alcohol consumption may be influencing factors on cognitive function. Early assessment and intervention of cognitive function are necessary in clinical diagnosis and treatment, and regular monitoring of thyroid function and evaluation of emotional scales are needed to assist diagnosis and treatment and promote cognitive function recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王雪梅,李毅.双相障碍Ⅰ型抑郁发作和重度抑郁障碍患者的认知功能与甲状腺功能及临床特征的关系[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2023,23(11):
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2023.11.002.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-26