强迫症患者工作记忆认知操作功能缺损与完美主义的相关性研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Correlation between working memory cognitive manipulation impairment and perfectionism in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨强迫症患者认知操作功能缺损与完美主义之间的关系。方法 采用方便抽 样法,随机选取 2022 年 1 月— 2023 年 1 月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院临床心理科门诊就诊的 69 例强迫症患者为研究组,同期在北京市朝阳区向社会面招募 74 名健康者为对照组。采用 Frost 多维 完美主义量表中文版(FMPS-C)和工作记忆认知操作任务分别测量两组受试者的完美主义水平以及认 知操作功能,并采用皮尔逊积差相关法分析两者之间的相关性。结果 最终纳入研究组 65 例、对照组 69 名。研究组患者的 FMPS-C 总分、非适应性维度得分高于对照组,适应性维度得分低于对照组,差异 均有统计学意义(均P< 0.01)。提示条件为“相反”时,两组受试者对中性、积极、消极 3 种词语的反应 时比较,差异有统计学意义(F=8.943,P< 0.01)。两两比较结果显示,研究组患者在 3 种词语刺激下的 反应时均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P< 0.05)。提示条件为“相反”时,研究组消极词语的 反应时长于积极与中性词语反应时(均P< 0.05)。两组受试者 3 种词语刺激下的转换消耗值比较,差异 有统计学意义(F=24.378,P< 0.001)。两两比较结果显示,研究组患者在中性、积极、消极 3 种词语刺激 下的转换消耗值高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P< 0.05)。研究组患者在消极词语刺激下的转换 消耗值高于中性和积极词语刺激的转换消耗值,差异均有统计学意义(均P< 0.01)。在中性词语的刺激 条件下,研究组患者的转换消耗值与非适应性维度得分呈正相关(r=0.18,P< 0.05);在消极词语的刺激 条件下,研究组患者的转换消耗值与 FMPS-C 得分、非适应性维度得分呈正相关(r=0.23、0.24;P< 0.05)。 结论 强迫症患者存在认知操作功能受损,在处理消极刺激时的受损程度更高,且这种认知操作困难 与非适应性完美主义呈正相关。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the correlation between cognitive manipulation impairment and perfectionism in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Methods Using convenience sampling method, 69 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who visited the Department of Clinical Psychology of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the research group. During the same period, 74 normal subjects were recruited from the public in Chaoyang District, Beijing as the control group. The Chinese version of Frost's Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS-C) and working memory cognitive manipulation task were used to measure perfectionism and cognitive manipulation function in two groups of subjects, respectively. Pearson product-moment correlation was used to analyze the correlation. Results Sixty-five patients in the study group and 69 in the control group were included. The total FMPS-C score and non-adaptive dimension score of the research group were higher than those of the control group, while the adaptive dimension score was lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P< 0.01). When the prompt condition was "opposite", there was a statistically significant difference in the responses of the two groups to the three words of neutral, positive and negative (F=8.943, P < 0.01). The pairwise comparison results showed that, the response of the patients in the study group was higher than that in the control group under neutral, positive, and negative stimuli, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). When the cue condition was "opposite", the response time of negative words in the study group was longer than that of positive and neutral words (all P< 0.05). Under neutral, positive, and negative stimuli, there was a statistically significant difference in the sorting cost values between the two groups (F=24.378, P< 0.001). The pairwise comparison results showed that, the sorting cost values of the study group patients under neutral, positive, and negative stimuli were statistically higher than those of the control group (all P < 0.05). The sorting cost value of patients in the study group under negative stimuli was higher than that under neutral and positive stimuli, and the difference was statistically significant (all P< 0.01). Under the neutral stimuli, the sorting cost value of the study group patients was positively correlated with the non-adaptive dimension score, and the difference was statistically significant (r=0.18, P < 0.05). Under the negative stimuli, the sorting cost value of the study group patients was positively correlated with FMPS-C score and non-adaptive dimension score, and the difference was statistically significant (r=0.23, 0.24; P< 0.05). Conclusions Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder have significant difficulties in cognitive manipulation function, especially in processing negative stimuli, and this cognitive manipulation difficulty is positively correlated with non-adaptive perfectionism.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘爱华,崔佳成,文江林,王东.强迫症患者工作记忆认知操作功能缺损与完美主义的相关性研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2024,24(6):
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2024.06.006.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-05