脑电生物反馈联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗伴有非自杀性自伤行为青少年抑郁症患者的效果
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20241462)


Effects of electroencephalographic biofeedback combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressive disorder adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury behavior
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨脑电生物反馈联合重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗伴有非自杀性自伤(NSSI)行 为青少年抑郁症患者的效果。方法 于2021年3月—2023年2月选取在石家庄市第八医院治疗的100 例 伴有 NSSI 行为青少年抑郁症患者为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为对照组和联合组各 50 例。对照组 采用 rTMS 治疗,联合组在 rTMS 治疗的基础上联合脑电生物反馈治疗。分析两组患者的临床疗效,采用 匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评估睡眠质量;检测治疗前后患者睡眠参数[睡眠潜伏期(SL)、睡眠效率 (SE)、实际总睡眠时间(TST)]及血清因子[褪黑素(MT)、脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、胶质源性神经营养 因子(GDNF)]水平;采用 24 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-24)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、渥太华自伤量 表(OSI)评估患者的精神认知情况;采用健康状况调查简表(SF-36)评估患者的生活质量,采用治疗副反应 量表(TESS)对不良反应进行评分。结果 联合组临床总有效率90.00%,高于对照组的74.00%,差异有统 计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者PSQI评分、SL、SE、TST比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后, 联合组PSQI评分、SL低于对照组,SE、TST高于对照组,且两组治疗前后差值比较,差异均有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者血清 MT、BDNF、GDNF 水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05);治疗后, 两组 MT、BDNF、GDNF 水平均升高,联合组 MT、BDNF、GDNF 水平高于对照组,且两组治疗前后差值比 较,差异均有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。治疗前,两组 HAMD-24、HAMA、OSI 评分差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);治疗后,联合组 HAMD-24、HAMA、OSI 评分低于对照组,且两组治疗前后差值比较,差异均有统 计学意义(P< 0.05)。治疗前,两组 SF-36 各维度评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);治疗后,联合 组SF-36各维度评分均高于对照组,且两组治疗前后差值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后, 对照组患者 TESS 评分为(1.65±0.40)分,联合组 TESS 评分为(1.71±0.45)分,两组 TESS 评分比较,差异 无统计学意义(t=0.705,P> 0.05)。结论 rTMS 与脑电生物反馈联合治疗伴有 NSSI 行为青少年抑郁症 患者的疗效较好,可以明显改善患者症状,增强脑神经信号传递,提高睡眠质量及生活质量,且安全 可靠。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the efficacy of electroencephalographic (EEG) biofeedback combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in depressive disorder adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behavior. Methods From March 2021 to February 2023, 100 depressive disorder adolescents with NSSI behavior in the Shijiazhuang Eighth Hospital were selected as participants. According to the random number table method, patients were divided into control group and combination group, with 50 cases in each group. Control group was treated with rTMS, and combination group was combined with EEG biofeedback on the basis of rTMS. The clinical efficacy of two groups of patients was analyzed. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and sleep parameters [sleep latency (SL), sleep efficiency (SE), actual total sleep time (TST)] and serum factors [melatonin (MT), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)] were measured before and after treatment. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and Ottawa Self-Injury Scale (OSI) were used to assess the patients' mental cognition. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) was used to assess the patients' quality of life, and the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) was used to evaluate adverse reactions. Results The total clinical effective rate of combination group 90.00% was higher than that of control group 74.00%, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in PSQI score, SL, SE, and TST between the two groups of patients (P> 0.05). After treatment, the PSQI score and SL of combination group were lower than those of control group, while SE and TST were higher than those of control group, and the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were also statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the levels of MT, BDNF, and GDNF between the two groups of patients (P> 0.05). After treatment, the levels of MT, BDNF, and GDNF increased in both groups, and combination group had higher levels of MT, BDNF, and GDNF than control group, and the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were also statistically significant (P< 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in HAMD、HAMA and OSI score between the two groups of patients (P> 0.05). After treatment, the HAMD-24、HAMA and OSI score of combination group were lower than those of control group, and the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were also statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of each dimension of SF-36 between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the SF-36 scores of combination group were higher than those of control group in all dimensions, and the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were also statistically significant (P< 0.05). After treatment, the TESS scores of control group and combination group were (1.65±0.40) and (1.71±0.45), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=0.705,P> 0.05). Conclusions The combination of rTMS and EEG biofeedback has a good therapeutic effectiveness in depressive disorder adolescents with NSSI behavior, which can significantly improve patient symptoms, enhance brain neural signaling, improve sleep quality and quality of life, and is safe and reliable.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

苏鹏,眭朝平,綦航,马立鑫,邓巧恩.脑电生物反馈联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗伴有非自杀性自伤行为青少年抑郁症患者的效果[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2024,24(12):844-850
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2024.12.002.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-30