青少年心境障碍患者自伤自杀行为与家庭因素的关系
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

首都医科大学科研培育基金项目 (PYZ22158); 国家临床重点专科建设项目 (3-2-2021-PT40)


Relationship between self-injury suicide behavior and family factors in adolescents with mood disorders
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨青少年心境障碍患者发生自伤自杀行为的家庭影响因素。方法 选取2020年 12 月— 2021 年 12 月在首都医科大学附属北京安定医院住院治疗的 137 例青少年心境障碍患者为研究 对象。采用一般资料调查表、青少年非自杀性自伤行为问卷(ANSAQ)、巴瑞特冲动性人格量表(BIS)、家 庭功能评定量表(FAD)、简式父母教养方式问卷中文版(s-EMBU)评估患者的非自杀自伤性行为、冲动 性人格特征、家庭功能存在的问题、父母教养方式的质量。根据患者过去 1 年是否有自伤自杀行为,将 患者分为无自伤自杀组(n=46)和自伤自杀组(n=91)。采用二项 Logistic 回归分析探讨导致自伤自杀行 为的影响因素。结果 自伤自杀组≤ 16 岁患者占比高于无自伤自杀组,差异有统计学意义(χ2 =3.967, P=0.046);与无自杀自伤组相比,自伤自杀组患者 BIS 运动冲动性[(29.44±7.23)分比(24.96±7.06)分]、 s-EMBU 拒绝维度母亲和父亲[(11.52±5.08)分比(9.53±3.36)分,(11.08±4.51)分比(9.50±3.81)分]得 分高,差异有统计学意义(t=3.436、2.380、1.989;P< 0.05);与无自伤自杀组相比,自伤自杀组 BIS 认知 冲动性和无计划冲动性[分别为(29.84±7.84)分比(34.02±8.08)分,(27.64±8.94)分比(31.93±8.54)分]、 FAD 总的功能因子[(28.59±3.14)分比(29.96±3.15)分]、s-EMBU 情感关怀维度父亲和母亲[分别为 (17.03±5.80)分比(19.18±5.07)分,(18.33±5.52)分比(20.33±4.73)分]得分低,差异有统计学意义(t= -2.902、-2.682、-2.385、-2.082、-2.083;均P<0.05)。二项Logistic回归分析结果显示,家族史阳性(OR=3.061, 95%CI=1.086~8.632)、BIS运动冲动性因子评分高(OR=1.090,95%CI=1.028~1.156),FAD总的功能因子 (OR=0.861,95%CI=0.749~0.990)和s-EMBU情感关怀- 父亲评分低(OR=0.914,95%CI=0.846~0.987)是 青少年心境障碍患者发生自伤自杀行为的影响因素(均P< 0.05)。结论 家族史阳性、性格冲动、父亲 对孩子的情感接纳与支持差、家庭功能差的青少年心境障碍患者可能容易发生自伤自杀行为。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the family influencing factors of self-injury suicide behavior in adolescents with mood disorders. Methods From December 2020 to December 2021, 137 adolescents with mood disorders in Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University were selected for the study. The General Information Questionnaire, Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment Questionnaire (ANSAQ), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), Family Assessment Device (FAD), and Short-Egna Minnenav Barndoms Uppfostran (s-EMBU) were used to assess the patients' non-suicidal self-injury behaviors, impulsive personality traits, problems with family functioning, and quality of parenting style. Patients were categorized into no-suicidal self-injury group (n=46) and self-injury suicide group (n=91) based on whether or not they had self-injury suicide behavior in the past year. Factors influencing self-injury suicide behavior were analyzed using binomial Logistic regression. Results There were more patients ≤ 16 years of age in self-injury suicide group than in no-suicidal self-injury group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =3.967, P=0.046). Compared with no-suicidal self-injury group, patients in self-injury suicide group had higher BIS motor impulsivity scores [(29.44±7.23) vs. (24.96±7.06)], s-EMBU rejection subscale maternal and paternal scores [(11.52±5.08) vs. (9.53±3.36), and (11.08±4.51) vs. (9.50±3.81)] with statistically significant differences (t=3.436, 2.380, 1.989; P < 0.05). Compared to no-suicidal self-injury group, self-injury suicide group had lower BIS cognitive impulsivity and unplanned impulsivity scores [(29.84±7.84) vs. (34.02±8.08), (27.64±8.94) vs. (31.93±8.54)], FAD total functioning factor scores [(28.59±3.14) vs. (29.96±3.15)], and s-EMBU emotional warmth subscale paternal and maternal scores [(17.03±5.80) vs. (19.18±5.07), and (18.33±5.52) vs. (20.33±4.73)], and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.902,-2.682,-2.385, -2.082,-2.083; P<0.05). Binomial Logistic regression showed that positive family history [OR=3.061, 95%CI (1.086, 8.632)], high BIS motor impulsivity factor score [OR=1.090,95%CI (1.028,1.156)], total FAD functional factors [OR=0.861, 95%CI (0.749,0.990)], and low s-EMBU emotional warmth-paternal score [OR=0.914, 95%CI (0.84, 0.987)] were influencing factors for self-injury suicide behavior in adolescents with mood disorders, and the differences were statistically significant (all P< 0.05). Conclusions Adolescents with positive family history, impulsive personalities, fathers with poor emotional acceptance and support for their children, and poor family function may be prone to self-injury suicide behavior.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孟庆鹏,周丹娜,杨丽娟,尹力,王丹.青少年心境障碍患者自伤自杀行为与家庭因素的关系[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2025,25(2):116-122
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2025.02.007.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-27