家庭参与联合经颅磁治疗对青少年抑郁症伴非自杀性自伤行为的治疗效果
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

包头市医药卫生科技计划项目 (wjwkj2020045)


Effects of family participation combined with transcranial magnetic therapy on adolescents with depressive disorder and non-suicidal self-injury
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究家庭参与联合经颅磁治疗对青少年抑郁症伴非自杀性自伤(NSSI)行为患者的 治疗效果。方法 选取2020年1月—2023年12月内蒙古自治区国药北方医院心理康复科收治的100 例 青少年抑郁症伴NSSI患者为研究对象。采用随机数表法将患者分为研究组和对照组,每组50例。两组 均口服盐酸舍曲林片,对照组在此基础上行经颅磁治疗,研究组在对照组基础上联合家庭参与治疗。 比较两组患者治疗前后总有效率、家庭功能、心理弹性及 NSSI 改善的情况。结果 治疗后,研究组临 床总有效率为 94.00%(47/50),高于对照组的 80.00%(40/50),差异有统计学意义(χ2 =4.332,P< 0.05)。 两组患者治疗后的心理弹性各项评分均高于治疗前,且研究组评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意 义(t=3.243、3.120、3.201;均P< 0.05)。两组患者治疗前后力量、乐观性差值比较,差异有统计学意义 (Z=-3.095、-2.475;P<0.05)。两组患者治疗后NSSI行为发生率及成瘾性评分均低于治疗前,自制力评分 高于治疗前,且研究组治疗后的成瘾性评分低于对照组,自制力评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前后成瘾性、自制力差值比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=3.693、-4.350; P< 0.05)。 两组治疗后家庭功能各项评分低于治疗前,且研究组评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.177、 2.098、5.157、5.740、3.334、7.432、3.906;均P< 0.05)。两组患者治疗前后问题解决、角色、情感反应、 行为控制、情感介入及总的功能差值比较,差异有统计学意义(Z/t=-3.874、3.986、3.873、-3.226、2.720、 3.670;P< 0.05)。治疗过程中,两组不良反应发生率比较[研究组 6.00%(3/50)比对照组 8.00%(4/50)], 差异无统计学意义(χ2 =0.154,P> 0.05)。结论 家庭参与联合经颅磁治疗有利于发挥抑郁症伴 NSSI 行为青少年患者家庭功能,增强患者心理弹性,改善 NSSI 行为。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of family participation combined with transcranial magnetic therapy on adolescents with depressive disorder and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Methods From January 2020 to December 2023, 100 adolescents with depressive disorder and NSSI admitted to the Department of Psychological Rehabilitation of Sinopharm North Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region were selected as participants. Patients were randomly divided into a study group and a control group using a random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Both groups were orally administered with sertraline hydrochloride tablets, and control group received transcranial magnetic therapy on this basis, while study group received treatment in combination with family participation on the basis of control group. The total effective rate, family function, psychological resilience, and improvement of NSSI were compared between two groups of patients before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of study group was 94.00% (47/50), which was higher than control group's 80.00% (40/50), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =4.332, P< 0.05). The psychological resilience scores of both groups of patients after treatment were higher than before treatment, and the psychological resilience scores of study group after treatment were higher than those of control group, with statistical differences (t=3.243, 3.120, 3.201; all P < 0.05). The difference in strength and optimism of the two groups of patients before and after treatment was statistically significant (Z=-3.095, -2.475; P< 0.05). The incidence of NSSI and addiction score in both groups of patients after treatment were lower than before treatment, while the self-control score was higher than before treatment, and the addiction score in study group was lower than those in control group after treatment, while the self-control score was higher than that in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in addiction and self-control score between the two groups before and after treatment (Z=3.693, -4.350; P < 0.05). After treatment, the family function scores of both groups were lower than before treatment, and the family function scores of study group were lower than those of control group after treatment, with statistical differences (t=7.177, 2.098, 5.157, 5.740, 3.334, 7.432, 3.906; all P < 0.05). The difference in problem-solving, role, emotional response, behavioral control, emotional intervention, and overall function between two groups of patients before and after treatment was statistically significant (Z/t=-3.874, 3.986, 3.873, -3.226, 2.720, 3.670; P< 0.05). During the treatment process, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [study group 6.00%(3/50) vs control group 8.00%(4/50)] (χ2 =0.154, P> 0.05). Conclusions Family participation combined with transcranial magnetic therapy is beneficial for leveraging the family function of adolescents with depressive disorder and NSSI, enhancing their psychological resilience, and improving NSSI.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王晓宏,张集慧,陈波,王丹丹,郭玉星.家庭参与联合经颅磁治疗对青少年抑郁症伴非自杀性自伤行为的治疗效果[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2024,24(10):713-719
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2024.10.005.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-12