功能性近红外光谱技术区分单纯GAD与共病ADHD的临床应用
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(82460282);贵州省科技计划项目(ZK-2023-一般195);贵州省高层次创新型人才项目(千层次)(gzwjrs2022-013)


Clinical application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in distinguishing simple GAD fromcomorbidity ADHD
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)技术在区分单纯广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)与共病注 意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的GAD 患者中的临床应用价值。方法 于2023 年10 月— 2024 年5 月在贵州 省第二人民医院的门诊和住院部招募34 例单纯GAD 成年患者(对照组),35 例GAD 共病ADHD 成年患 者(研究组)。采用成人ADHD 自我报告量表(ASRS)评估受试者的注意缺陷与多动/ 冲动症状,同时使用 7 项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)评估其焦虑症状,使用基于1-BACK 任务的fNIRS 技术检测两组患 者前额叶皮层(PFC)氧合血红蛋白(Oxy-Hb)浓度的变化。结果 研究组ASRS 注意力不集中分量表得 分、多动分量表得分和GAD-7 得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。行为学数据表明,两 组患者在1-BACK 任务期间的反应时和准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。1-BACK 任务期 间,与对照组比较,研究组患者在PFC 的多个区域表现出明显的激活增强[经错误发现率(FDR)校正后 P< 0.05],包括三角部额下回(通道7、8、9),额中回(通道15、43)、背外侧额上回(通道16、17)和中央前 回(通道11)。当以GAD-7 得分为协变量进行秩ANCOVA分析以控制焦虑严重程度时,发现先前观察到 的所有通道组间差异无统计学意义(均P> 0.05)。同时,GAD-7 作为协变量的效应在所有通道中也未达 到统计学显著水平(经FDR 校正后均P > 0.05)。结论 焦虑严重程度可能是影响PFC 功能激活的关键 中介变量,在利用fNIRS 技术鉴别单纯GAD 与GAD 共病ADHD时需重点控制该混杂因素。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in distinguishing patients with generalized anxiety disorder( GAD) alone from those GAD comorbid with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder( ADHD). Methods From October 2023 to May 2024, 34 adult patients with GAD alone were recruited as a control group, and 35 adult patients with GAD comorbid with ADHD were recruited as a study group from the outpatient and inpatient departments of the Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province. The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale( ASRS) was used to assess participants' attention deficit and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, while the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7( GAD 7) was employed to evaluate anxiety symptoms. FNIRS based on the 1-BACK task was used to detect changes in oxy-hemoglobin( Oxy-Hb) concentration in the prefrontal cortex( PFC) of both groups. Results The scores of the ASRS attention deficit subscale, hyperactivity subscale, and GAD-7 in study group were higher than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant( all P<0.05). Behavioral data indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in reaction time and accuracy between the two groups during the 1-BACK task( all P>0.05). During the 1-BACK task, compared with control group, patients in study group exhibited statistically enhanced activation in multiple regions of PFC [false discovery rate(FDR)- corrected P < 0.05], including the triangular inferior frontal gyrus( channels 7,8,9), middle frontal gyrus( channels 15, 43), dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus( channels 16, 17), and precentral gyrus( channel 11). However, when conducting a rank ANCOVA analysis with GAD-7 scores as a covariate to control for anxiety severity, all previously observed between-group channel differences were found to be statistically insignificant( all P > 0.05). Additionally, the effect of GAD-7 as a covariate did not reach statistical significance across all channels (all FDR-corrected P > 0.05). Conclusions The severity of anxiety may serve as a key mediating variable influencing prefrontal cortical activation. When utilizing fNIRS to distinguish between GAD alone and GAD comorbid with ADHD, careful control of this confounding factor is essential.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李嘉霖,舒燕萍,谭江,刘逸洋,张继元,吴刚.功能性近红外光谱技术区分单纯GAD与共病ADHD的临床应用[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2026,26(2):77-
DOI :10.3969/j. issn.1009-6574.2026.02.001.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-09